Saturday, August 5, 2017

TV Shows I Recommend


So one of the reasons that I haven't posted in a while is that I was getting into TV shows. I figured that you all might be interested in what I was watching and what I recommend. These will just be short blurbs and nothing in-depth but I hope you like them!

Master of None
Dev is a man who is trying to get more acting roles and fall in love. The show focuses on current issues like dating, sexism, and family in our current time. 

Yuri on Ice
Yuri is an ice skater who seems to only fail and doubt himself. Out of the blue he finds his hero, ice skating champion Viktor, wants to train him. The two fall in love while trying to win gold. 

Wild China
This documentary series shows how nature affected the economy and the culture of Chinese people. 

My Love Story
Takeo Gouda is a huge guy who feels like no girl can actually love him. After rescuing Rinko Yamata from a pervert on a train, the two fall for each other. The two have to deal with others judging them but the more people know who they really are, the more they understand. 

Stranger Things
A small town in the 1980s starts experiencing supernatural events. A boy named Will goes missing, a strange bald girl appears, and a monster are all involved. 

Making a Murderer
This documentary series shows how one man is pinned for a murder he didn't do. We see corrupt police, scheming, and a case that is still trying to be figured out by the public. It is a bit slow at times but a cool watch. 

Parks and Recreation
A hard working woman in the Parks and Rec department has to work with an apathetic group of people, citizens who get wound up about the wrong things, and a slow and under-funded part of the government. The sitcom is hilarious as it is heart-warming. 

My Dead Boyfriend

On a Scale of 1 to 10, with 10 Being the Best
5
Courtesy of MemeCrunch
Plot: Mary has a tough life. The same day Mary got fired she finds her boyfriend dead in her apartment. When Mary goes to an art museum and brings up her dead boyfriend, Primo, she gets the attention of the museum owner who states he was an excellent artist and fantastic person. This surprises Mary as it took her almost 20 minutes to even figure out her dead-beat boyfriend was actually dead. Throughout Mary trying to figure out what to do with his possessions and body, she keeps finding out things about Primo. My Dead Boyfriend has a lot of twists in the end but a good end. Overall, this movie has a great idea but I think Mary's character was so unlikable for the reason that she was so lazy or unwilling to talk about things. For instance, she tries to get a roommate but refuses to show them around the apartment. She tries to talk to one of of Primo's ex-girlfriends but keeps hanging up the phone when she answers. I would say you can give this movie a try but don't expect it to be your favorite movie. This is based on the book Dog Run by Arthur Nersesian. 

Characters/Actors of Note:
Heather Graham playing Mary McCrawley: This character had all the makings of someone we could relate to and like. She is poor, she was in a bad relationship, and she is sticking to cruddy choices because she thinks that is all she is worth. We've all been there. What isn't likable about her is that she seems to rarely listen to people, is lazy, and enjoys self-pity. Her motivations are confusing too. She wants to know more about Primo and seems to research him endlessly, but when it comes time to talk about Primo to other people she will act as if she isn't interested by his life or is annoyed by it. So why exactly is she doing it? Miss Graham plays Mary one-dimensional and I don't know if that is her fault or the fault of the script. 
Katherine Moennig playing Zoe: Zoe is supposedly Mary's best friend. They tried to start a band together but failed and they both complain about their issues. When it comes to Primo, Zoe seems aloof. This character could have been a kind supportive character but Mary talks about how she is afraid Zoe will be mad at her often and in the end we find out something nasty that Zoe did to Mary. I wish there could have been one good relationship in this film and they missed out with this character. 

Music: This is an indie movie so you can guess all the music is indie. Indie rock to be precise which if you like that, good for you. If you are like me, you don't. In fact, I find it grating after a while and the indie music lasted the entire film. Mary joins two indie rock groups and so it makes sense to the plot but it just isn't my cup of tea. 

Camera Work/Cinematography: Where to begin with this? At the start of the film we see Mary walking around with cartoons that appear around her when she is walking home. You find out later they are cartoons she has drawn herself as an attempt to be an artist. However, after the first ten minutes they are never seen from again. I was expecting they could be like non-speaking narrators or companions for Mary but they literally disappear. We see Mary's active imagination whenever she finds out something new about Primo. When she finds out that Primo was a part of theatre, she imagines him on stage singing and dancing. I did like the idea of this but they seem to pick and choose when she imagines things. Since this is an indie film, the cinematography isn't great. The film consists of mostly close-ups and a basic color scheme. It's a bleh look. 

RECAP:
The story is unique but not well written. The characters have potential but not well written. The music is fine if you like indie but can be suffocating if you don't like indie rock. The camera work is basic and hardly varied and the cinematography is touch and go. Watch for the interesting idea but don't be heart broken if you miss out. 
Courtesy if IMDB
Want me to critique a movie? Comment below!

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

Changeling

On a Scale of 1 to 10, with 10 Being the Best
4
Courtesy of Buzzfeed
Plot: A woman's child goes missing and when she reports the incident and the police can't find the child, the mother is blamed. Christine Collins is threatened, given a fake child, and even institutionalized by the LAPD and that isn't even the whole story. The movie is based on true events (I recommend looking up the whole story) but is very long and the end is unsatisfying. I was disappointed that there were added scenes to make the story more intriguing because I thought the real story was enough on its own. The real parts of the story is powerful and so shocking that I had to pause the movie at one point to collect my thoughts. The idea and acting were there but the execution was not. 

Characters/Actors of Note:
Angelina Jolie playing Christine Collins: I have seen my fair share of Ms. Jolie in drama films before and once again she hits it out of the park. Jolie knows what emotions should be in which scenes and how to handle the awkwardness of having a fake child. The truthfulness in the acting is what is needed the most for this film and I thought it was well done. *Spoiler* The only issue I had with Jolie wasn't her fault but did affect her acting. The director and writers of the film decided to add that Christine Collins went to the execution of a kidnapper/murderer and confronted the man in jail. It seemed out of place because it was...it didn't happen in reality. I wish that the creators of the story would have stuck to the facts instead of adding "intrigue." The fictional scenes made the acting less powerful because it took me from being, "Oh, that's awful what happened to them," to "Why would she do that?" 
Jeffery Donovan playing Captain J. J. Jones: Who wouldn't go finding a child, institutionalize an innocent woman, and tell other officers not to work on a missing person's case so they wouldn't look stupid? That would be Captain J. J. Jones, world class jerk of stupidity. Mr. Donovan plays his character as high strung, impatient, and above all ego driven person who is not used to be challenged. I thought the amount of cruelty and injustice that Mr. Donovan shows was well balanced and believable. Often villain characters go way too big and drastic but Jones' behavior was on point. 

Music: The music is an earmark for an Eastwood film with its jazz-like sound. It's often slow with not many instruments, usually just a piano and a guitar. Also, every single song sounds just like the next song. It was rather boring and I feel that the movie would have been the same if it was not included at all. Thumbs down here. 

Camera Work/Cinematography: The film has sharp lines and contrast which is a signature mark for an Eastwood film. I was surprised to see how much bright white light was used on the actors in the film. Often that can wash them out but it mostly made them look pale but was able to bring out contrast. It also created many shadows on the faces and the rest of the set. This could have been done to represent the mystery of what happened to the son or the darkness that Christine Collins felt. I was not impressed with the choices and wish that there was more creativity done here. 

RECAP: 
The story is interesting and the acting was on point, however the extra scenes made the actors appear fake. The music was done poorly and the cinematography could have been more creative. I would stress that most of the story is accurate and that makes it fascinating and a bit disturbing to watch. I would say watch it if you are interested in the Christine Collins case but don't watch it for entertainment reasons. 
Courtesy of Behance
Want me to critique a movie? Comment below!

Sunday, December 20, 2015

Hot Fuzz

On a Scale of 1 to 10, with 10 Being the Best
8
Courtesy of Buzzfeed
Plot: An expert police officer from London is good, in fact he's too good. The police agency thinks that Nicholas Angel is showing everyone up so he is transferred from crime filled London to the quiet town of Sandford. The town is voted "Village of the Year" but there are numerous accidents that keep occurring in the town. Are they accidents or is Nicholas Angel paranoid? This is a brilliant comedy and detective movie if I ever saw one. Buddy Cop movie to the max!

Characters/Actors of Note:
Simon Pegg playing Nicholas Angel: The thing that I love the most about the "Cornetto Trilogy" is that each character is vastly different from one another. In this film, Mr. Pegg is a put together cop that has awkward interactions with the Sandford townies. He hands out tickets and arrests like there is no tomorrow. That is not the only characteristic that defines him as he has to learn how to have fun and make friends. I loved watching Nicholas Angel go from strict to a more fun loving person. It was adorable!
Nick Frost playing PC Danny Butterman: To every yin there is yang and Danny Butterman is that yang to Nick Angel's yin. Even though he is a great person, Danny Butterman is not a good cop but wants to be very badly. Danny loves cop movies and wants to do all the crazy action sequences he's seen. When first meeting Angel he bombards him with questions like, "Have you ever fired two guns whilst jumping through the air?" Eventually, we get to have all the satisfaction of a cop movie and some fuzzy feelings thanks to Mr. Frost. 

Music: The music is fun. The music comes off with some dance-y beats.The other instruments include a rock and roll guitar, keyboard, and vocals that sound like a British 60s band. I love the lyrics to the songs and how the lines in the movie are put into the music. It pushes the cutesy buddy cop movie theme again and again. Lovely!

Camera Work/Cinematography: The movie has well used cut and slow motion scenes. For whatever reason, I particularly liked the scene where they bought ice cream over and over. The slow motion made the film so funny and at the same time created tension. Even though blue ice cream was bought in the film, I don't feel like the color blue was that prominent. The colors were well used for mood however. There were bright colors for the town, and then dark colors for the realization of what was happening, and sort of a mix at the end. 

RECAP:
The plot to the film was fun and I actually did not see the end coming (for the most part). I loved how Nicholas Angel and Danny Butterman got to be good cops and have fun while doing it. The acting was good, the music was fun, and the camera work was well done. If you are looking for an excellent buddy cop movie, please watch this!

Courtesy of gamesrader.com
Want me to critique a move? Comment below!

Saturday, December 19, 2015

Sucker Punch

On a Scale of 1 to 10, 10 Being the Best
10
Courtesy of Buzzfeed
Plot: A teenage girl, nicknamed Baby Doll, tries to protect her sibling from her abusive step-father but it goes horribly wrong. She is sent to a mental institution where she fantasizes of a two part world. The first is that she is not in a mental institution but a dance hall/brothel and the other world is where she and the other inmates fight all sorts of characters to free themselves of the mental institution. The movie is brilliantly made and well written. Two thumbs up!

Characters/Actors of Note:
Emily Browning playing Baby Doll: This character appears soft and delicate which of course makes her the most talented killer. All of the characters had intense weapon and body training to prepare themselves for their roles. Ms. Browning had most of the action sequences and was the leader of the girls. Even though she was quiet, she did not come off as shy. The watchers also are told that she is feisty and daring. I did not get this vibe but got the feeling that she was serious. These duel feelings may have been the angle that the director was after. 
Carla Gugino playing Dr. Vera Gorski: It is fun to see how Baby Doll's imagination changed some of the characters around. Gorski is the head psychiatrist in the mental institution who helps the inmates by having them act and sing. In the imagination of Baby Doll however, she is the dancing coach of the brothel and is second in command. This is to reflect that some shady nurses are going over her head and taking control of the inmates. Ms. Gugino has to switch personalities from reality to the imaginative. It was great to see the differences of personalities and the realization that occurred with this character. 
Oscar Issac playing Blue Jones: Blue Jones is a nurse that works in the institution but to the girls, is the pimp of the brothel. As a nurse he is a conniving and sniveling jerk who takes advantage of the defenseless. As head of the brothel he is a controlling and murderous psychopath. Once again we see a character that switches personalities. Mr. Isaac's performance makes the viewers automatically wary and afraid of him. At the end, we discover just exactly why he is portrayed as a pimp which makes the viewers sick. 

Music: The music is rock and roll to the max. There is screamo, slow rock songs, and an orchestra that uses guitars and brass. I love how they incorporate the dancing music to the battles. The songs can be listened to by themselves and are often really cool rock covers of famous songs. On top of that, you can listen to Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon to the film and it would fit perfectly. It is not often that the soundtrack of a movie can be that edgy and listenable. 

Camera Work/Cinematography: The movie was striking in many ways. First, the lines and blurriness worked very well together. To give a saddened look to the film, the film looked streaky as if it from water but at the same time the lines are clear enough to give it a sharpness. The colors being mostly grey and blue were well used to show the depression of the girls and the gravity of war. There was the added benefit of a steam punk aesthetic. The bad guys could be robots, people, or a combination of both. The clothes were also a cool combination of steam punk and battle clothes. It was an interesting choice and very much the right choice. It's not often that steam punk is put in films and on top of that, make so much sense. Even though the clothes are revealing it makes sense in that they reflect that the girls are vulnerable, especially to Blue Jones. 

RECAP: 
The acting was well done and the action scenes were amazing! The look of the film was new and edgy and awesome. The music makes the listener feel like they are at a rock concert. This movie is so different from the norm and it was done so well that it deserves applause. 
Courtesy of MoviePoster.com
Want me to critique a movie? Comment below!

Monday, August 10, 2015

The Aviator

On a Scale of 1 to 10, with 10 Being the Best
5

Plot: The movie is based off of Howard Hughes' life beginning with his first directed film and ending with his court date with US government.  The film shows how Howard Hughes went from being a ambitious perfectionist to a paranoid and perverted man. The story is fascinating but I wished that there was more. The ending had me curious and had to look up more information.  

Characters/Actors of Note:
Leonardo DiCaprio playing Howard Hughes: It was amazing to see how Mr. DiCaprio could change from a young ambitious character to an old and extremely paranoid character. The body shapes and moods are so different from one another but it is understood that this is still Howard Hughes. Mr. DiCaprio was even nominated for an Oscar...but we all know how that ended up. Has DiCaprio ever let me down before? Great acting per usual. 
Cate Blanchett playing Katharine Hepburn: I first thought that Ms. Blanchett was being over the top but then I realized that Katharine Hepburn was really like that. Ms. Blanchett did extensive research into this part watching at least 10 of her films, taking cold showers, and playing sports as Hepburn did. She seemed odd but fun, just as Hepburn was. Ms. Blanchett was spot-on in this performance and won an Oscar for her work. 

Music: The movie takes place in the 30s and 40s and enjoyed how the music sounded like it came from that era. The jazz music in the beginning and even the orchestra for Hughes' actions were well done. The music had lots of brass which created as much tension as there was excitement. 

Camera Work/Cinematography: The movie was bright and the lines were done well. After reading some trivia about the film, I learned that Scorsese tried to make the film seem like it was in the 30s and 40s by using the same color format. He wanted to make the film seem as blurry as those films as well. I am glad that the blurriness was not added and personally did not notice the coloring until it was pointed out. The issue I had with the film is one of Scorsese's trademarks, which is rapid cut shots. If the point was to make the film seem 30s and 40s, how about using the same types of cuts and fading techniques used during that era? Did I like the way the film was done...for the most part yes. Did I think Scorsese achieved his 30s/40s look....no. 

RECAP:
The acting was spot-on and impressive. The music was perfect. The camera work was not done well but the cinematography was. The script could have used a better ending but the rest of the writing was good. It made me squirm, it made me think, and it made me sad. I thought about this film often afterwards just because it was so as disturbingly interesting. I recommend it. 

Courtesy of 411 Posters
Want me to critique a movie? Comment below!

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Mad Max: Fury Road

On a Scale of 1 to 10, with 10 Being the Best
7
Courtesy of Metapicture
Plot: In the future everyone is fighting for survival. The only things that are left are cars, water, and other people which are scarce and often abused. This film focuses on Furiosa who is trying to smuggle out the warlords wives and get to "the green place." On their way they meet Max who was kidnapped and used as a blood donor by the warlord party. Max is haunted by his past which causes him to hallucinate. It is an interesting story-line but I wish that the annunciation in the film was more clear so we could understand the story-line better. I have not watched the other Mad Max films but did not need to, to understand this film. 

Characters/Actors of Note: 
Tom Hardy playing Mad Max: Mr. Hardy had few lines in this film and despite the movie being named after him, isn't the main character. Max does come to save the day in the end and is a huge help but is forced to come along with the crew. He was more of a reluctant hero. I would say that Mr. Hardy did a nice job of being the silent tough guy but how hard could that be to do? 
Hugh Keays-Byrne playing Immortan Joe: This villain was perfect. Immortan Joe is the warlord that has been abusing his power of the people by taking away their water, having multiple wives, and kidnapping strangers to be blood donors to his suicidal army. Immortan Joe tracks his missing wives and risks many of his soldiers lives to do so. Mr. Keays-Byrne does an excellent job of keeping his control while also being desperate; it could be compared to his own costume which makes him appear powerful but is hiding the fact that it is keeping him alive. Nice balance was given to this character.
Charlize Theron playing Imperator Furiosa: As stated before, Furiosa is more of the main character of this film. She is the one that smuggled out the wives, got Max to help her, and kicks many butts. Ms. Theron did a fine job being tough. The language she uses with the wives is in the same tone she uses with the riders. The wives seem intimidated by her but Furiosa obviously cares for all the characters and what she is doing. Ms. Theron balances out her roughness with her empathy well in this film. 

*I was happy to find out that Eve Ensler helped write many of the female roles. I commend the writing of these characters as they weren't just the normal damsels in distress.

Music: The music involves a lot of drums and brass which surprised me as I felt that there was a lot of guitar while watching the film. The movie sounds like rock and roll with a mixture of horror. Junkie XL or Tom Holkenborg was in charge of this music and has done a lot with horror films. Despite me hating horror films I thought that this score was well done. 

Camera Work/Cinematography: Wow, wow, wow was this done so beautifully. Many apocalypse films often use dusty or grey colors but this was not that kind of film. The director stated he was tired of dystopian films done in this matter and remarked that desert people often find beauty in their land. There were tons of colors and wonderful effects in this film. Most of the scenes were not made from CGI which will help the film keep it's beauty longer. My favorite scene was the desert storm scene which used lively blues, reds, and oranges along with bright lightning strikes. I also loved the camera angles as it still gave the effect of fast and crazy without straying from the characters. Often action movies are so involved with fist fights and sprawling that they take away the focus from the faces but this film stayed with the characters.  The costumes and make-up were fantastic for this film as they used representational colors and incorporated the level everyone was at from the "well-treated" wives to the dirty car riders. The use of chrome was clever as it added cult-like beliefs along with some brightness to the film. The pull way from the greatness is the speediness looked very similar to a Baz Luhrmann film, which gave it a sort of cartoonish vibe. The vibrant hallucinations and even the credits seemed a bit over the top as well. 

RECAP:
The plot was well done but the words were so mangled in the film that I lost parts of the story. Since there was hardly any dialogue I will take that every line in this film was important, if only I could hear it. The acting was well done. The music was fine and the cinematography was great. It is a good action film but thanks to it's cinematography, is a great one despite it being a bit over-the-top. 
Courtesy of IndieWire
Want me to critique a movie? Comment below!